One, big, beautiful U.S. update

Richard Schmidt

July 4, 2025


Key takeaways

  • The One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act was passed into U.S. legislation.
  • Despite headlines, U.S. markets continue to navigate policy changes, geopolitical conflicts and debt concerns tactfully.
  • We continue to have a positive outlook for U.S. equities. 

After a close vote, the GOP (Grand Old Party, the Republican Party of the United States of America) was able to push aside internal disagreements and pass the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act through the U.S. House of Representatives. The President signed off on the bill, coincidentally or not, on U.S. Independence Day. 

Explaining the bill and why it’s so divisive

The bill adds new tax cuts and extends tax cuts that were enacted during President Trump’s first term that were set to expire at the end of the year. It ups spending on defence and border security, while tightening Medicaid eligibility and reducing food assistance alongside other government aids. It also includes an increase to the U.S. federal debt ceiling, quelling default concerns (more on that later).

The bill has been deeply contentious, not just between Republicans and Democrats, but within the Republican party too. Supporters argue the bill is pro-growth, that it will lower taxes, improve cost of living, secure borders, strengthen the military and reduce the deficit over time, in conjunction with other policies relating to deregulation, trade (tariffs) and wasteful spending. Critics argue that the bill will disproportionately benefit corporations and the wealthy, that it cuts vital support to those that need it most and that it will add substantially to the national debt

How does it impact Canadian investors? 

Section 899 of the bill, dubbed the ‘revenge tax,’ could potentially increase withholding taxes on income earned from U.S. assets by foreign investors (Canadians included) in countries deemed to have unfair taxes on American companies. With that said, we believe the likelihood of a revenge tax on Canadian investors is low.

A heavy-handed approach would be counterproductive for the U.S. as long-term benefactors of foreign investment into its companies and its economy. Section 899 is likely a bargaining chip, to be used sparingly and temporarily, to influence other countries into lowering taxes on American businesses.

Case in point, the Canadian government recently cancelled the Digital Services Tax (DST), a tax on large technology companies (think Amazon, Netflix) and the digital revenues they derive in Canada following complaints from President Trump. Given the cancellation of the DST, the likelihood of a new Canada/U.S. trade deal passing soon has risen, further lowering the odds of a revenge tax being used on Canadian investors.

Assuming that it is used on Canadians, it will likely only apply to dividend income (the risk of broader application does exist however) and the S&P 500 Index has a very low dividend yield, close to 1%. In our investment strategy, we generally prefer U.S. businesses that are either reinvesting in themselves or returning capital through share buybacks. Canadians already pay U.S. withholding taxes, hence our preference for other return drivers.

While the One, Big, Beautiful Bill is something we continue to watch, it is far from being our biggest investment concern.

How big of problem is America’s federal debt? 

Back in May, the credit rating agency Moody’s downgraded U.S. sovereign debt from Aaa (Highest quality) to Aa1 (Very high quality) on concerns about long-term fiscal sustainability. Admittedly, the size of the debt (~US$36 trillion), servicing the debt and reducing the debt are challenges, and will continue to be a major focal point in American politics, but we believe the situation is far from being a crisis. Financial markets appear to agree as the reaction to the change was muted, much like similar downgrades in 2011 and 2023.

As previously mentioned, the passing of the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act includes a US$5 trillion increase to the federal debt limit, alleviating immediate default concerns. One might ask, isn’t this just “kicking the can down the road?” Yes, but the idea is to provide the government with some breathing room, allowing it to continue paying its obligations as it works on reducing the debt over the longer term. Given these developments, we do not believe the federal debt is currently a major source of risk. 

American involvement in the Middle East

Our team has always viewed the conflict between Iran and Israel as being contained and having a low likelihood of impacting the global economy. Given global sanctions, we don’t invest in Iran. However, if Iranian oil fields went offline or if the Straight of Hormuz was blocked, this would have created upward pressure on oil prices and downward pressure on risk assets like equities. Clearly, this was an outcome that all parties wanted to avoid—Israel and the U.S. did not target oil fields, while Iran did not want to cripple its only major source of revenue.

As of writing, hostilities have ceased, and President Trump has loudly proclaimed that “the 12-day war” is over. He has been firm with rhetoric that he considers the situation to be concluded. Again, in our view, the conflict remains a relatively small concern for investors.  

We continue to hold a net positive view on U.S. equities

Our 12-to-18-month outlook is modestly bullish as additional fiscal accommodation is likely globally. Furthermore, central banks around the world have generally eased monetary policy. Stock markets have also broadly recovered from the volatility we saw earlier in the year. However, we must note that financial assets remain somewhat sensitive to headlines.

Within our portfolios with a tactical asset allocation overlay, we continue to have a tactical overweight to equities relative to fixed income and cash. The bulk of this tactical overweight is in U.S. equities as fiscal support remains expansionary, earnings growth remains relatively high versus other regions and the U.S. Federal Reserve maintains its capacity to cut rates should it need to. Absent a recession, equities should continue their long-term trend higher.

Looking at USD, most other currencies have strengthened versus the greenback year-to-date. Movement has been less driven by interest rate differentials, suggesting that U.S. dollar denominated assets are being rebalanced into other markets, Canada included.

We will continuously monitor the evolving landscape, not just in the U.S., but globally, to determine if adjustments are needed to best position your portfolio for long-term success.


Richard Schmidt

Richard Schmidt, CFA, is a Portfolio Manager with the Multi-Asset Management Team of Scotia Global Asset Management. His primary focus is on North American equity funds and pools.